India’s Free Speech Ranking: Cause for Concern or Misleading Perception?


India's poor ranking (24th out of 33) in the Free Speech Index gives one reason to worry about media repression, trolling on the internet, and government crackdowns. Defects in survey methodology, biased choice of countries, and conflicting rankings, however, detract from its validity. A balanced, fact-based approach is necessary to correctly evaluate India's free speech climate. 

Image Credit : Live Law
Freedom of Speech & Expresion (IC : LiveLaw) 

India’s recent ranking of 24th out of 33 countries in the Global Free Speech Index has reignited the debate about the state of free speech in the world’s largest democracy. Given its history of vibrant journalism and political discourse, this low ranking is alarming. It raises the question: Is free speech in India truly in decline, or is the ranking a result of flawed methodology and selective perception?


Concerns Over Declining Free Speech

Several recent incidents lend weight to concerns that India’s free speech environment is deteriorating.

  • Legal Challenges to Online Content: The Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, recently challenged an Indian court order demanding the removal of a Wikipedia page related to a legal dispute with the news agency ANI. Wikimedia argued that such orders create a chilling effect on free speech and access to information.

  • Surge in Hate Speech: According to a report by India Hate Lab, anti-minority hate speech incidents in 2024 increased by 74% compared to the previous year. While India has legal frameworks to curb hate speech, selective enforcement and the targeting of dissenting voices contribute to concerns about shrinking spaces for free expression.

  • Crackdown on Media and Dissent: Journalists and activists have faced increasing legal scrutiny, sedition cases, and internet shutdowns, fueling fears that the state is limiting criticism under the guise of law and order.

  • Attacks on Journalists and Online Trolling: Independent journalists who challenge the government’s narrative or criticize policies have faced physical attacks, online abuse, and even imprisonment. Many face relentless trolling, with threats of violence, doxxing, and character assassination campaigns by partisan online groups. This creates an atmosphere of fear, discouraging critical reporting.

Questioning the Survey Methodology

While these issues are concerning, it is equally important to scrutinize the methodology used to rank India so low in the index.

  1. Limited Sample Size: The survey only included 33 countries, leaving out many that could have provided a better global perspective. The selection criteria for these countries remain unclear, raising concerns about bias.

  2. Reliance on Perception Rather Than Facts: The ranking is largely based on public perception surveys, which can be influenced by media portrayal and political bias rather than actual legal frameworks protecting free speech.

  3. Contradictory Rankings: Some authoritarian-leaning countries ranked higher than India. For instance, Hungary and Venezuela—where press freedom has faced significant challenges—scored better. This raises doubts about the objectivity of the index.

A Global Perspective on Free Speech

India's ranking needs to be looked at in relative terms as well. The United States, much quoted as an example of free speech, has experienced serious constraints on expression over the last few years. To take one example, under Donald Trump's administration, debates about gender identity and critical race theory were subjected to intense pushback, resulting in book bans and educational curtailments. Unless the index is sensitive to such contextual facts, it cannot offer a true representation.



Conclusion: A Balanced Approach Needed

There is no denying that India faces serious challenges to free speech, and cases of media suppression should not be ignored. However, ranking India lower than some authoritarian regimes suggests a flawed assessment. Instead of accepting such rankings at face value, a more comprehensive, evidence-based approach is needed to evaluate the state of free speech in India and across the world.


Comments

Post a Comment